Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

7609 dot1q 1 native rejected

I am in the process of replaceing 7206VXR for a 7609 WS-SUP720-3B running Native IOS :c7600s72033-advipservicesk9-mz.122-33.SRC6

The issue I am having is when I try to add "encapsulation dot1q 1 native" to one of my sub-interface's, I get an error that states "Command rejected: VLAN1 cannot be allocated because it is the default vlan".

7206VXR Int Conf:

interface GigabitEthernet5/2
  no ip address
!
interface GigabitEthernet5/2.1
encapsulation dot1Q 1 native
ip address x.x.x.x
interface GigabitEthernet5/2.200
encapsulation dot1Q 200
ip address  x.x.x.x

!

7609 Int Conf:

Router(config)#interface GigabitEthernet5/2.1

Router(config-subif)#encapsulation dot1Q 1 native
Command rejected: VLAN 1 cannot be allocated because it is a default VLAN

Thanks for your help!

Everyone's tags (3)
1 REPLY
Hall of Fame Super Blue

Re: 7609 dot1q 1 native rejected

maxiaoliang wrote:

I am in the process of replaceing 7206VXR for a 7609 WS-SUP720-3B running Native IOS :c7600s72033-advipservicesk9-mz.122-33.SRC6

The issue I am having is when I try to add "encapsulation dot1q 1 native" to one of my sub-interface's, I get an error that states "Command rejected: VLAN1 cannot be allocated because it is the default vlan".

7206VXR Int Conf:

interface GigabitEthernet5/2
  no ip address
!
interface GigabitEthernet5/2.1
encapsulation dot1Q 1 native
ip address x.x.x.x
interface GigabitEthernet5/2.200
encapsulation dot1Q 200
ip address  x.x.x.x

!

7609 Int Conf:

Router(config)#interface GigabitEthernet5/2.1

Router(config-subif)#encapsulation dot1Q 1 native
Command rejected: VLAN 1 cannot be allocated because it is a default VLAN

Thanks for your help!

You can't do this because of global vlans vs local vlans. Have a look at this thread which explains it -

http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/99661

instead of using subinterfaces can you not simply use a L3 vlan interface which is the standard way of doing it on L3 switches. And yes the 7600 is sold as a router but it and the 6500 are based on a similiar architecture.

Jon

736
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies