cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
684
Views
10
Helpful
9
Replies

about ospf adj

jj-zhou
Level 1
Level 1

Hi netpro:

I have two routers , they have been full state ,and I can find each other by show ip os neighbor ,buI they can't recieve peer's route . the interface s0 is point-to-multi and hello-time is 10s ,routerBs int s0 is point-to-point.

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

Even if you suceed to form a full adjacency by changing the timers to match, the fact that the two routers see the link to each other as a different type will certainly cause ospf to detect an anomaly and not come up with the right topology.

Hope this helps,

Harold Ritter
Sr Technical Leader
CCIE 4168 (R&S, SP)
harold@cisco.com
México móvil: +52 1 55 8312 4915
Cisco México
Paseo de la Reforma 222
Piso 19
Cuauhtémoc, Juárez
Ciudad de México, 06600
México

View solution in original post

9 Replies 9

royalblues
Level 10
Level 10

Can you post the configuration of both the routers

Narayan

Harold Ritter
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

This will not work since the two sides will default to different ospf interface types. Try adding "ip ospf network point-to-multipoint" under the interface on each side.

Hope this helps,

Harold Ritter
Sr Technical Leader
CCIE 4168 (R&S, SP)
harold@cisco.com
México móvil: +52 1 55 8312 4915
Cisco México
Paseo de la Reforma 222
Piso 19
Cuauhtémoc, Juárez
Ciudad de México, 06600
México

Hi hritter:

do you think that the status full can't ensure router receiving route from peer ? both net-type and hello-time must be same.

thank you

Hi hritter:

I have other question, I think that if the two routers have been full ,they had to exchange the ospf DBD inform, so now they can't receive DBD how to form adj ?

thank you

Even if you suceed to form a full adjacency by changing the timers to match, the fact that the two routers see the link to each other as a different type will certainly cause ospf to detect an anomaly and not come up with the right topology.

Hope this helps,

Harold Ritter
Sr Technical Leader
CCIE 4168 (R&S, SP)
harold@cisco.com
México móvil: +52 1 55 8312 4915
Cisco México
Paseo de la Reforma 222
Piso 19
Cuauhtémoc, Juárez
Ciudad de México, 06600
México

Just to add to my previous comment. If you run a "deb ip ospf spf" in such a scenario, you will see that the LSA is received from the neighbor but that ospf will report the following message when detecting that the link-type is different on either side:

00:11:17: OSPF: Schedule SPF in area 0

Change in LS ID 3.3.3.3, LSA type R, , spf-type Full

00:11:21: OSPF: running SPF for area 0, SPF-type Full

00:11:21: OSPF: Initializing to run spf

00:11:21: OSPF - spf_intra() - rebuilding the tree

00:11:21: It is a router LSA 3.3.3.3. Link Count 3

00:11:21: Processing link 0, id 1.1.1.1, link data 192.168.123.3, type 1

00:11:21: No RTR Back link <++++++ This prevents ospf from considering the link in its topology

As you can see, this router considers the link to the neighbor as a type 1 (point-to-point), where as the other side is seen as a type 2 (transit network).

Hope this helps,

Harold Ritter
Sr Technical Leader
CCIE 4168 (R&S, SP)
harold@cisco.com
México móvil: +52 1 55 8312 4915
Cisco México
Paseo de la Reforma 222
Piso 19
Cuauhtémoc, Juárez
Ciudad de México, 06600
México

BTW: Here are the "deb ip ospf spf" output messages from the other router:

00:57:33: OSPF: Initializing to run spf

00:57:33: OSPF - spf_intra() - rebuilding the tree

00:57:33: It is a router LSA 1.1.1.1. Link Count 2

00:57:33: Processing link 0, id 192.168.123.3, link data 192.168.123.1, type 2

00:57:33: Can not find next node 192.168.123.3 listed in LSA LSA type 1, LS ID 1.1.1.1

See how this other router considers the link as a type 2 (transit network).

Hope this helps,

Harold Ritter
Sr Technical Leader
CCIE 4168 (R&S, SP)
harold@cisco.com
México móvil: +52 1 55 8312 4915
Cisco México
Paseo de la Reforma 222
Piso 19
Cuauhtémoc, Juárez
Ciudad de México, 06600
México

Hi hritter

Your answer is very helpful, the router recevied lsa but it can't use them for spf arithmetic, right ?

That is correct.

Hope thius helps,

Harold Ritter
Sr Technical Leader
CCIE 4168 (R&S, SP)
harold@cisco.com
México móvil: +52 1 55 8312 4915
Cisco México
Paseo de la Reforma 222
Piso 19
Cuauhtémoc, Juárez
Ciudad de México, 06600
México
Review Cisco Networking products for a $25 gift card