07-08-2009 05:06 PM - edited 03-04-2019 05:22 AM
Hi,
We have a WAN Back Up globally in a active-standby scenario,
where the backup link becomes active only when the primary MPLS link fails.
Now we are planing to active-active architecture whereby policy-based routing can employed to shift non-latency sensitive traffic(Like Internet Traffic) over to the backup link to free up valuable bandwidth on the more expensive MPLS link for applications which require strict service guarantee.
instead of keeping backup link ideal we are planing for active-active setup.
One important thing which need tobe consider is all my internet traffic will go to proxyserver of the datacenter.
Please find the network setup diagram for better understanding.
Can some one help me to find out the solution for this
07-08-2009 05:52 PM
Can your rephrase the question. I don't understand what you are asking.
07-08-2009 06:25 PM
if you want pbr to route and with failover capability, you can look up pbr with ip sla support.
07-09-2009 05:02 AM
Possible solutions might include:
PBR
QoS
PfR
Regarding QoS, if the issue is ". . . applications which require strict service guarantee.", then QoS might be all you need, whether you use one path or both.
Regarding PfR, believe it can be tied to traffic types so it will insure critical traffic is preferred on one link, or one with best end-to-end performance, yet dynamically utilize, as best possible, both links' bandwidth. (Effectively, it's a dynamic PBR.)
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide