Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. If you'd prefer to explore, try our test area to get started. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

Bad Design?

Im looking over a design of a remote site, and I am a little confused

The interface on router for the lan is 192.168.96.6

However, the cat switch that is connected

to that interface has an IP address of

192.168.97.6 (vlan1) learned via dhcp

router#GigabitEthernet0/1 is up, line protocol is up

Internet address is 192.168.96.251/23

router#sh cdp neighbors gigabitEthernet 0/1 det

-------------------------

Device ID: LAN1

Entry address(es):

IP address: 192.168.97.6

How can you have 2 interfaces connected

on different networks?

And the users all getting 192.168.97.x

ip's while the router they are connecting

to has 192.168.96.x on the interface?

and here is the config for the cat switch

interface Vlan1

ip address dhcp

no ip route-cache

ip default-gateway 2x6.xx.xx.209

ip http server

access-list 25 permit 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255

1 REPLY
Hall of Fame Super Blue

Re: Bad Design?

Because the network has a /23 subnet mask so the two addresses are on the same network ie.

192.168.96.0 255.255.254.0 covers the range

192.168.96.1 -> 192.168.97.254

Jon

88
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies