I do 'show ip bgp' and route 10.177.110.0 is advertised OK but 10.177.330.0 is not.
Then I did 'show ip route 10.177.330.0' and it stated:
Routing entry for 10.177.330.0/24 Known via "connected", distance 0, metric 0 (connected, via interface) Routing Descriptor Blocks: * directly connected, via Vlan3 Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1
Then I notice that such '10.177.330.0/24' is advertised under the 'router osp[f 1' on Router1.
Question: If this is learned via connected or IGP, shouldn't this network also get installed on the BGP routing table?
I do not understand why I do not see 10.177.330.0 under 'show ip bgp'.
Re: Basic question on route not in BGP routing table
My apologies again for the confusion. I will promise to myself I will only paste info on this forum from now on. :-)
However, Giuslar hit the nail once again.
I was told to advertise network 10.177.130.0/24 via BGP to ISP.
However, there is no 10.177.130.0/24 in the ip routing table.
I see that I have 10.177.130.0/27 in the routing table.
So that means that once I advertised 10.177.130.0/24 via BGP, since there is no exact match in the routing table, the prefix was not advertised via BGP.
So I will have to consult the ISP and confirm the mask given to me was wrong I guess...
gw1#show ip bgp 10.177.130.0 255.255.255.0 % Network not in table gw1#show ip route 10.177.130.0 Routing entry for 10.177.130.0/27 Known via "connected", distance 0, metric 0 (connected, via interface) Routing Descriptor Blocks: * directly connected, via Vlan3 Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1
gw1#show ip bgp 10.177.130.0 % Network not in table
We are pleased to announce availability of Beta software for 16.6.3. 16.6.3 will be the second rebuild on the 16.6 release train targeted towards Catalyst 9500/9400/9300/3850/3650 switching platforms. We are looking for early feedback from custome...