Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

BGP and EIGRP routing

Is it possible to have 2 different protocols (bgp and eigrp) in the routing table with the same cost and the same destination? (maybe change bgp administrative distance to 170 same as eigrp) If so, how does the router determine which protocol to use?

Thanks.

2 REPLIES

Re: BGP and EIGRP routing

Hi,

If AD is the same, they will use metrics to determine which route to inject in the routing table.

See http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/21.html

Regards,

Dandy

New Member

Re: BGP and EIGRP routing

If you have two equal cost routes, they are equal cost.

The thing is, the metric structure of each routing protocol is generally incompatible, so it is up to the protocol itself to offer its best route or routes to the routing table.

That being said, BGP only offers up the best route (routes) to the routing table, which it arrives at via its standard procedure. EIGRP will do the same. They will come up with completely different metrics, which aren't really comparable to each other.

The router will not determine which protocol to use, it will admit really whichever gets the first within the limits of the cef load balancing max-paths set. If a path doesn't get admitted it doesn't get admitted.

I'd like to hear more about why you'd like to do this. It is EXTREMELY dangerous and can lead to very unpredictable network behavior as well as routing loops and worse.

Within your network you still need IGP routes to get to BGP next-hops, so if everything is reachable via EIGRP you're going to have to be very creative to get them into bgp and complete to be sent around anyway, and that amount of work can be very counterproductive.

Bottom line, barring some really innovative reason for needing to do this, I see it as a very dangerous and risky move that will require a lot of extra effort just to get going anyway.

Looking forward to hearing more about what you want to do with this.

NS

132
Views
9
Helpful
2
Replies
CreatePlease login to create content