I was doing a lab test for this new feature. The lab senario is very simple, R1 send 10.1.1.0/24 to R2, R2 will conditional injects 10.1.1.0/25 and 10.1.1.128/25 to the BGP table. Unfortunately, I failed to make this happen. Below is the show ip bgp command output:
r2#sh ip bgp 10.1.1.0
BGP routing table entry for 10.1.1.0/24, version 2
Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
Not advertised to any peer
10.0.0.1 from 10.0.0.1 (10.2.1.1)
Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, external, best
r2#sh ip bgp inj
r2#sh ip bgp injected-paths
As you can see, there is no routes to be injected which should be there. I 've tried it over and over but no luck. Could anybody help me figure out this issue. What have I missed?
is kind of misleading? It's the link says using 10.1.2.1/32 for route source and it looks just like a loopback address to me. And also, if there is a diagram on this link, it would be easier for us to correctly set up a lab senario and quickly verified this BGP feature. Thanks for you help.
Question We run asr9001 with XR 6.1.3, and we have a very long delay to
login w/ SSH 1 or 2 to the device compare to IOS device. After
investigation, the there is 1s delay between the client KEXDH_INIT and
the server (XR) KEXDH_REPLY. After debug ssh serv...
Introduction The purpose of this document is to demonstrate the Open
Shortest Path First (OSPF) behavior when the V-bit (Virtual-link bit) is
present in a non-backbone area. The V-bit is signaled in Type-1 LSA only
if the router is the endpoint of one or ...
Hi, I am seeing quite a few issues with patch install and wanted to
share my experience and workaround to this. Login to admin via CLI, then
access root with the “shell” command Issue “df –h” and you’ll probably
see the following directory full or nearly ...