Currently have a BGP multihoming configuration to 2 different ISPs. BGP failover time seems to be taking between 3/4 mins. All BGP timers are currently set to defaults. Can anyone give me any advice on how to reduce the time it takes for BGP to failover onto the secondary eBGP peering when the primary eBGP peering stops forwarding traffic? I know we could possibly change the keepalive and holdtimes on the eBGP neighbors, but not sure this would be good practice.
Any recommendations or advice would be greatly appreciated.
Many thanks for the advice! I have tested 'neigh fall-over' and reduced the BGP timers on our lab kit and this has dramatically reduced the time it takes for the eBGP peer to age out, and BGP to converge over to the secondary link.
I will now be discussing this with our ISPs who we have eBGP peering arrangement, to look at the possibilities of implementing this solution on the live service.
Personally, with current equipment and links, multiple BGP paths and interactive to real-time traffic, I've felt default BGP "neighbor timers" of 60/180 sec is slugish. This is something you might discuss with your ISPs; determine their thinking about "best practice" regarding reducing the values.
Besides what Giuseppe suggests, another newer technology that you might want to consider is OER/PfR, if your platforms support it. This can often fairly rapidly detect problems to specific prefixes and route traffic (best outbound) to another path. (The technology can do much more.)
Hi everyone, I would like to thank you in advance for any help you can provide a newcomer like myself!
Im studying the 100-105 book by Odom and am currently on the topic of Port security. I purchased a used 2960 and I'm trying to follow a...
While deploying a number of 18xx/2802/3802 model access points (APs), which run AP-COS as their operating platform. It can be observed on some occasions that while many of their access points were able to join the fabric WLC withou...
I am going to design and build an LAN network under a tunnel underground with long distance between the switches.
I will have 2 Catalyst switches and 8 Industrial IE3000, and they will be connected with fiber.
For now I am planning on use Layer-2 s...