I have a thought that may or may not apply, and here is the litmus test: Are you seeing 300k throughput per the bittorrent app, or per the show policy-map interface command on the router? If it is the former, then I would think that strange myself but it must be due to the mechanisms of the token-bucket algorithm, etc...
But if it is the latter, if the router shows <= approximately 128k but your host shows 300k, then adding what Nichole said, for a sanity check you may want to make sure that your box is really recognizing all of the Bittorrent traffic. Since you were able to add the "match protocol bittorrent" command, you have the proper pdlm's loaded. If you didn't have the proper PDLM's loaded/imbedded or they were incompatible with the underlying NBAR version, you would have received an error message and it would not have taken those commands - don't ask how I know :-)
I would recommend this test: create an access-list that points to your bittorrent host, then add a match statement for that access-list to the END of your "denybt" class-map. Then run bittorrent again, and the counters & bit rate matching that access-list within the show policy-map int will tell you if the bittorrent pdlm is catching all, some, or none.
Hi everyone, I would like to thank you in advance for any help you can provide a newcomer like myself!
Im studying the 100-105 book by Odom and am currently on the topic of Port security. I purchased a used 2960 and I'm trying to follow a...
While deploying a number of 18xx/2802/3802 model access points (APs), which run AP-COS as their operating platform. It can be observed on some occasions that while many of their access points were able to join the fabric WLC withou...
I am going to design and build an LAN network under a tunnel underground with long distance between the switches.
I will have 2 Catalyst switches and 8 Industrial IE3000, and they will be connected with fiber.
For now I am planning on use Layer-2 s...