Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

Cisco 871/881 & PPPoE RFC 4638 Supported: Yes/No?

I've been searching for hours and just can't seem to get to the bottom of this one!

I am connected to an ISP which supports RFC 4638, but I'm trying to figure out exactly which Cisco I need to buy to support this. This RFC is related to using MTU 1500 over PPPoE by using "baby jumbo frames" I'd assume the ethernet MTU would effectively end up being 1508 in order to accomodate the PPPoE header.

Cisco does support RFC 4638 with "tag ppp-max-payload", but doing so requires an ethernet interface which can ingress/egress frames (slightly) larger than 1500 bytes. What I cannot figure out, is which routers can do this and on what ports. It seems fairly likely based on various internet chatter that the large ISRs support up to MTU 1600 on the FE ports, which would definitely do the trick. I have no doubt that this would work just fine on 1841/1921, but I'd rather not have to have such a large/power hungry piece of kit where it really isn't necessary. What of the 800 series?

I can confirm, and fully expect this to be impossible on the 10/100 switch ports (FastEthernet0-3), as the chip they're attached to (usually something like 88E6063 plain doesn't support it) but there is no such hardware limitation on the FE port attached directly to the CPU (WAN/FastEthernet4)

The question is basically: Has Cisco actually implemented "baby jumbo" (1500-1600 byte) frames on the 800 series FE WAN port, that would be needed to support the "tag ppp-max-payload" command! Thought this'd be an easy one!

2 REPLIES
New Member

Re: Cisco 871/881 & PPPoE RFC 4638 Supported: Yes/No?

After getting one to experiment with, I think I can now answer my own question.

Running 15.1(4)M2, Attempts to set MTU on FE4 resulted in "Interface FastEthernet4 does not support user settable mtu.". This lead me to suspect that all 5 of the rear ports are connected to the L2 switch, with a little software trickery to make FE4 appear like a real standalone ethernetnet interface, when it isn't. Likely to save $1 on parts.

Examination of the routers internals confirms this. Given that there's no "system mtu" configuration option, every port will always be stuck on MTU 1500.

(Interestingly there's an alternate path from FE4 back to the CPU, via a 'non-fitted' chip about the right size to be a 10/100 PHY. Maybe Cisco were going to give it a real WAN port but changed their mind at the last minute)

So does this mean RFC 4638 would work? If so, I have no idea how; but I suspect, probably not. Time for an ISR...

New Member

Re: Cisco 871/881 & PPPoE RFC 4638 Supported: Yes/No?

I can confirm this has a good chance of working on a C1841 running c1841-adventerprisek9-mz.151-4.M2.bin

Router(config)#interface FastEthernet 0/0

Router(config-if)#mtu ?

  <64-1600>  MTU size in bytes

Router(config-if)#mtu 1600

Router(config-if)#

That looks like baby jumbo's to me. Doesn't work with anything less than Advanced Enterprise images. A tad overkill when all you want it for is PPPoE.

I know this feature was added for use with MPLS, so don't yet know if the PPPoE layer will work with it, I'll test it sometime in the next few weeks.

1583
Views
0
Helpful
2
Replies
CreatePlease to create content