Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

Class-Default bandwidth question

Hi all,

Can someone point me to another source of documentation that confirms the actual bandwidth allocated to the Class-Default when no specific Bandwidth Percent command is given?

policy-map scheduler-lmc

class prec5

priority percent 10

class prec3

bandwidth percent 50

class class-default

fair-queue

Link Bandwidth: 4000

Link type: Ethernet

max-reserved-bandwidth is Default: 75%

Question: What percentage of link BW is allocated to the Class-Default?

My own argument would be:

75% (max-reserved-bandwidth) -/- 60 %(LLQ + 2nd Q) = 15%

I follow this reasoning because when I attempt to configure the Class-Default with the Bandwidth Percent command, I am only allowed to configure 15%.

HOWEVER: According to the infromation provided in the link below: Class-Default takes it?s bandwidth from the percentage that is not available for allocation to configured classes, read: 25% (100% of link BW -/- 75% max-reserved-bandwidth).

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fqos_c/fqcprt2/qcfconmg.htm#wp1003189

1 REPLY

Re: Class-Default bandwidth question

Hi,

First please understand, queueing config is only applied, if congestion exists. So class-default traffic could take 100% of your interface bandwidth, IF no other traffic is present.

Second, in most cases there is also traffic not accounted for in the class-maps, f.e. L2 keepalives, system packets, CDP, and so on. The router will prioritize some of this traffic. Therefore allocating 100% to user traffic is not feasible and thus the (conservative) approach with 75% of interface bandwidth.

Per se it is therefore also not simple to say X% of traffic is allocated to class-default.

By the way, the QoS 2.2 class covers this in detail.

Regards, Martin

276
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies