The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Yes (to your post's header question) and no (to your post's content).
You can use the same class-map in both IN and OUT CBWFQ policies, as they generally just match packets. (Although you're not doing so in your posted config, don't forget when matching, and using ACLs, source and destination reverse for IN and OUT.)
You can use some of the same policy map class statements, for both IN and OUT, but in your IN policy you're using class statements (queuing) that are limited to just OUT policies.
We are pleased to announce availability of Beta software for 16.6.3. 16.6.3 will be the second rebuild on the 16.6 release train targeted towards Catalyst 9500/9400/9300/3850/3650 switching platforms. We are looking for early feedback from custome...