Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. If you'd prefer to explore, try our test area to get started. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

Conceptual question on VPLS vs 802.1q tunneling (QinQ)

Which service do you see deployed more often to customers ordering L2 VPN? VPLS or QinQ?

The document I have been reading states that QinQ has some advantages over VPLS. However, I have heard people talking a lot about VPLS deployment but I rarely see people talking about QinQ... just wondering.

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
Hall of Fame Super Bronze

Re: Conceptual question on VPLS vs 802.1q tunneling (QinQ)

You will see more offering on QinQ when your requirements are 'metro' connections, in other words, connecting locations within the metropolitan area.

QinQ requires the provider to have a switched backbone which is very hard to extend outside the metropolitan area.

VPLS, pseudowire, can be offered rather easier as it can be configured over IP/MPLS backbones by using ATOM or L2TPv3.

HTH,

__

Edison.

1 REPLY
Hall of Fame Super Bronze

Re: Conceptual question on VPLS vs 802.1q tunneling (QinQ)

You will see more offering on QinQ when your requirements are 'metro' connections, in other words, connecting locations within the metropolitan area.

QinQ requires the provider to have a switched backbone which is very hard to extend outside the metropolitan area.

VPLS, pseudowire, can be offered rather easier as it can be configured over IP/MPLS backbones by using ATOM or L2TPv3.

HTH,

__

Edison.

1275
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies