Based on this configuration would the class-default not utilize any existing remaining bandwidth as needed versus tail dropping as it is per the output below..? The end user is knowingly not tagging the COS 2 traffic correctly therefore causing much of the traffic to flow to the class-default bucket...although we will get this corrected I was wondering why the packets got dropped regardless of the tagging as I understood the class-default would consume remaining bandwidth. Is the bandwidth remaining and queue limit config lines as configured above putting restrictions on this capability? Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. I have scrubbed lots of documentation but finding it hard to place my finger on something decisive.
Question We run asr9001 with XR 6.1.3, and we have a very long delay to
login w/ SSH 1 or 2 to the device compare to IOS device. After
investigation, the there is 1s delay between the client KEXDH_INIT and
the server (XR) KEXDH_REPLY. After debug ssh serv...
Introduction The purpose of this document is to demonstrate the Open
Shortest Path First (OSPF) behavior when the V-bit (Virtual-link bit) is
present in a non-backbone area. The V-bit is signaled in Type-1 LSA only
if the router is the endpoint of one or ...
Hi, I am seeing quite a few issues with patch install and wanted to
share my experience and workaround to this. Login to admin via CLI, then
access root with the “shell” command Issue “df –h” and you’ll probably
see the following directory full or nearly ...