In order to get LB working I need to use vrf on dialer interfaces. This is where the problem begins. When I remove vrf forwarding from the dialer0 interface IPSEC is fine, but not with vrf. Of course doesn't make sense trying two dsl lines when single vrf is not playing ball.
Adding tunnel vrf monsters under tunnel config is of no use. I have 50sites all without this and they're all good.
Re: DMVPN: Bonding Two DSL to Provide LoadSharing with VRF
As stated above we have 12.4(22)T, apologies for not making that clear. In terms of SRND and various DMVPN design guides, we have utilized these to the max and have an extended live DMVPN dual-hub dual-cloud network.
The problem is IPSEC when both tunnel intf and dialer are in the same vrf.
This is actually a pretty cool feature, i didn't even know it existed until I was looking for a solution to advertise a subnet (prefix in BGP talk), only if a certain condition existed. This is exactly what conditional advertisements does
j ai une question j ai achete un routeur cisco 887VA-k9 , je le configuré avec la configuration ci- dessous
si je le lier avec mon pc portable sur l un de ses ports directement ça marche toute est bien ( la connexion internet + m...
Attached policy provides CLI access to the Cisco 4G router over text messaging. Two files are in the attached .tar file:
2. PDF with instructions on how to load and use the .tcl file.