I was configuring DMVPN in the lab and I faced an issue with EIGRP updates propagaion. Basically, my setup is comprised of one hub router and 2 spokes. The hub and one of the 2 spokes have Class C network in their inside sides, while the 2nd spoke router has a class B subnet of 188.8.131.52 wih a class C subnet mask of /24.
when configuring DMVPN, the EIGRP works fine with all except for the 184.108.40.206/24 network which doesn't get propagated. The spoke of concern particiapates in the EIGRP communications and learns all the routes but I dont know why its internal subnet doesn't get propagated to the other routers!
When enabling debug on the hub and spoke of concern, I see the following error message:
*Mar 1 04:40:46.022: EIGRP: Packet from ourselves ignored
After seeing that, I went and changed the subnet 220.127.116.11/24 to 192.168.1.0/24 and things worked fine with the same config!!
Does anybody have an idea of why was it failing with 18.104.22.168/24?!
In the 60/24 block, I have an interface having the IP 22.214.171.124 assigned to it. As this was not propagating through EIGRP, I changed the IP of this interface to 192.168.1.6 and replaced the 60 subnet with this one in my EIGRP process. I dont have any other dynamic routing running in my setup.
The config is too simple, please find attached the config of the spoke in question.
Hi everyone, I would like to thank you in advance for any help you can provide a newcomer like myself!
Im studying the 100-105 book by Odom and am currently on the topic of Port security. I purchased a used 2960 and I'm trying to follow a...
While deploying a number of 18xx/2802/3802 model access points (APs), which run AP-COS as their operating platform. It can be observed on some occasions that while many of their access points were able to join the fabric WLC withou...
I am going to design and build an LAN network under a tunnel underground with long distance between the switches.
I will have 2 Catalyst switches and 8 Industrial IE3000, and they will be connected with fiber.
For now I am planning on use Layer-2 s...