Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. If you'd prefer to explore, try our test area to get started. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

EIGRP Routing Design Question

hello all.

i inherited a large frame-relay hub and spoke network with multiple hubs and using only static routing. there are about 10 hubs, and each remote router is connected to one of these hubs, plus a backup hub (the same for every router). we would like to implement a dynamic routing protocol, and i have experience with OSPF and EIGRP. we've decided on EIGRP, but here's the issue and hence my question: the WAN addresses *within* each hub are unique, but there is overlap from one hub to another. for instance, 10.1.1.1 is a WAN interface on Hub1, Hub2, Hub3, etc. Is this a problem for EIGRP? We don't really care about learning the WAN routes, just the loopbacks on the remote routers and some static routes, both of which *are* unique, unlike the WAN addresses.

i hope i made this clear. i understand the IP overlap is not ideal, but getting those changed is an even bigger project than implementing a routing protocol, so if i can avoid it, i will. i believe EIGRP should work, but i know

OSPF won't, because it won't be able to build an accurate picture of the network with all that overlap.

thanks for your time!

  • WAN Routing and Switching
7 REPLIES
Blue

Re: EIGRP Routing Design Question

" for instance, 10.1.1.1 is a WAN interface on Hub1, Hub2, Hub3"

Huh? You lost me...can you elaborate further on that?

From my experience, the most efficient way to implement eigrp on a frame relay hub and spoke environment is to create point-to-point subinterfaces on the hub and spoke, with /30 subnets on the WAN links.

HTH

Victor

New Member

Re: EIGRP Routing Design Question

sorry, yes, that is what we have done. the problem is that 10.1.1.0/30 is used for a WAN subinterface on Hub1, Hub2, and Hub3, etc.

Blue

Re: EIGRP Routing Design Question

Im still not understanding it.

Are you saying you have duplicate addresses on your network?? How can you assign the same subnet to 3 different serial interfaces on 3 different routers?

What am I missing?

New Member

Re: EIGRP Routing Design Question

yes, we have duplicate addresses.

Hall of Fame Super Silver

Re: EIGRP Routing Design Question

Hello John,

OSPF is out of discussion.

EIGRP can support this but:

be aware that EIGRP external routes have a field that contain the EIGRP router-id.

So you need to verify that the overlapping ip address is not chosen by any router as eigrp router-id.

sh ip eigrp topology should report the router-id.

in case you can force the EIGRP router-id with eigrp router-id command

see

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2/iproute/command/reference/1rfeigrp.html#wp1031884

Readdressing can be performed on a link by link basis provided that you access the remote router from the backup hub (that I hope it is fine) make your changes on the primary link and verify connectivity.

I would think of readdressing you can do it gradually over time.

Hope to help

Giuseppe

Blue

Re: EIGRP Routing Design Question

Alrighty then....

Giuseppe is right, of course. You need to re-address your network. Honestly, I have never seen such a cockamamie set up. Why on earth would anyone deliberately assign duplicate IP addresses on their network? What could that possibly buy them?

New Member

Re: EIGRP Routing Design Question

Giuseppe, you've confirmed my thoughts, thank you.

FYI, we would configure the loopback on each router to be the EIGRP router-id.

156
Views
0
Helpful
7
Replies
This widget could not be displayed.