Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. And see here for current known issues.

how many IMA group does one AIM-ATM support

Hi i have a problem similar to another post i found on the forum, but without an answer . We have a network design similar to this :

Branch_1_Router=====HubRouter=====Branch_2_Router

Tha idea is to buy a 2821 with aim/atm bundle 4E1 Wvic, and on HubRouter make a 2E1 connection towards Branch_1, and another 2E1 connection towards Branch_2.Obviously the two connwction are different L3 connection, with differnet IMA-GROUP. Is this design supported with only ONE AIM/IMA slot ?

I found this configuration on cisco website :

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk39/tk356/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080174992.shtml

in this there are all the E1 link boundled under IMA-GROUP 0 , and then configured the L3 under ATM/IMA0 interface, and under this interface there is nothing referred to ima-group 0; so i imagine the ima-group 0 is linked to ATM/IMA0 . If so, how can i configure more than 1 ima-group (if possible) and let it manage by only 1 AIM/IMA ?

thanks in advance

Max

2 REPLIES
Hall of Fame Super Silver

Re: how many IMA group does one AIM-ATM support

Hello Max,

two IMA groups each with 2 E1 should be possible and indeed expected

see this example

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/atm/configuration/guide/atm_cfg_atm_ps6441_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html#wp1005541

ima-group group# under physical interfaces to declare to what group they belong

and datasheet of ATM AIM

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps282/products_data_sheet09186a0080088753.html#wp39992

>> IMA 1.1 Support

Hope to help

Giuseppe

Hall of Fame Super Gold

Re: how many IMA group does one AIM-ATM support

Are you sue you still want to use IMA ?

There is a lot of wasted bandwidth with ATM at low speed, beside the added hardware complications.

For these reasons using simple IP or MLPPP is a better choice.

319
Views
0
Helpful
2
Replies