06-06-2012 02:43 AM - edited 03-04-2019 04:34 PM
Hello Everyone:
Below is my lab topology:
Role of Router:
C1: IBGP Peer of RR_T1(non-client)
RR_T1: RR tier 1(non-client)
RR_T2_1: RR tier 2, client of RR_T1
RR_T2_2: RR tier 2, client of RR_T1
C2: client of RR_T2_1 & RR_T2_1
all routers reside in BGP AS 1 & OSPF area 0 without additonal configurations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C2(config-router)#do sh ip ro os
Gateway of last resort is not set
2.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O 2.2.2.2 [110/3] via 45.0.0.4, 00:05:03, GigabitEthernet2/0
[110/3] via 35.0.0.3, 00:05:03, GigabitEthernet1/0
3.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O 3.3.3.3 [110/2] via 35.0.0.3, 00:05:03, GigabitEthernet1/0
4.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O 4.4.4.4 [110/2] via 45.0.0.4, 00:05:03, GigabitEthernet2/0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C2(config-router)#do sh ip bg 1.1.1.1
BGP routing table entry for 1.1.1.1/32, version 2
Paths: (2 available, best #2, table default)
Multipath: iBGP
Not advertised to any peer
Refresh Epoch 3
Local
12.0.0.1 (metric 3) from 4.4.4.4 (10.0.0.4)
Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal
Originator: 10.0.0.1, Cluster list: 10.0.0.4, 10.0.0.2
Refresh Epoch 3
Local
12.0.0.1 (metric 3) from 3.3.3.3 (10.0.0.3)
Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal, best
Originator: 10.0.0.1, Cluster list: 10.0.0.3, 10.0.0.2
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C2(config-router)# do sh run | s r b
router bgp 1
bgp router-id 10.0.0.5
bgp log-neighbor-changes
network 5.5.5.5 mask 255.255.255.255
neighbor 3.3.3.3 remote-as 1
neighbor 4.4.4.4 remote-as 1
maximum-paths ibgp 2
C2(config-router)#
according path selection rules of BGP all 8 criteria above step 9th is equal, now after configuring maximum-paths ibgp i thought it should result multiple equal-cost paths toward 1.1.1.1, but it didn't. Anybody knows the reason?
thanks
Solved! Go to Solution.
06-06-2012 04:09 AM
Hello Yuening,
look at the output of
show ip route 1.1.1.1
the effect of the command should be to have two BGP routes installed for the prefix, however in show ip bgp 1.1.1.1 you still see a single BGP best path selected.
you see that there is the line declaring multipath iBGP
C2(config-router)#do sh ip bg 1.1.1.1
BGP routing table entry for 1.1.1.1/32, version 2
Paths: (2 available, best #2, table default)
>>>>>Multipath: iBGP
However, also the two BGP asvertisements are different just in the cluster list so the original BGP advertisement is only one with a single BGP next-hop. You should have the same IP prefix advertised by two different routers with different BGP next-hops to see the command in effect.
Hope to help
Giuseppe
06-06-2012 04:09 AM
Hello Yuening,
look at the output of
show ip route 1.1.1.1
the effect of the command should be to have two BGP routes installed for the prefix, however in show ip bgp 1.1.1.1 you still see a single BGP best path selected.
you see that there is the line declaring multipath iBGP
C2(config-router)#do sh ip bg 1.1.1.1
BGP routing table entry for 1.1.1.1/32, version 2
Paths: (2 available, best #2, table default)
>>>>>Multipath: iBGP
However, also the two BGP asvertisements are different just in the cluster list so the original BGP advertisement is only one with a single BGP next-hop. You should have the same IP prefix advertised by two different routers with different BGP next-hops to see the command in effect.
Hope to help
Giuseppe
06-06-2012 08:44 PM
hello Giuseppe,
Thank you very much. after manually modifying the next-hop the load-balancing is done.
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: