Now, what I want to do is set the neighbor statements in the BGP configs on both hub and spoke routers to the tunnel addresses of each's peer:
router bgp 65000
neighbor 220.127.116.11 remote-as 65000
network 192.168.165.0 mask 255.255.255.0
router bgp 65000
neighbor 18.104.22.168 remote-as 65000
network 10.234.61.0 255.255.255.224
Now, assuming my DMVPN configs are correct, (and they are, because I tested the tunnel before implementing the BGP test), I would think the tunnel would establish, essentially making the devices appear to be one hop away from each other, and the tunnel IP's would form the BGP neighborship.
However, I could not get this to work, and I am guessing it is because you can't BGP peer a virtual interface to a virtual interface if your routers are not physically adjacent.
Is this correct? Does the BGP peering have to be done between routers that are physically next to each other from a layer 3 perspective?
Question We run asr9001 with XR 6.1.3, and we have a very long delay to
login w/ SSH 1 or 2 to the device compare to IOS device. After
investigation, the there is 1s delay between the client KEXDH_INIT and
the server (XR) KEXDH_REPLY. After debug ssh serv...
Introduction The purpose of this document is to demonstrate the Open
Shortest Path First (OSPF) behavior when the V-bit (Virtual-link bit) is
present in a non-backbone area. The V-bit is signaled in Type-1 LSA only
if the router is the endpoint of one or ...
Hi, I am seeing quite a few issues with patch install and wanted to
share my experience and workaround to this. Login to admin via CLI, then
access root with the “shell” command Issue “df –h” and you’ll probably
see the following directory full or nearly ...