Cisco Support Community
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Community Member

ip tcp adjust-mss and ip mtu difference

       Most of the time both the commands are used as ingress on the LAN interface at the CE Router.

       Need to know why exactly is IP Tcp adjust-mss is used, most of the answers I found were that TCP adjust-mss command is used when we need to avoid fragmentation, how does it affect a frame coming on an interface, how does it change the size of the segment and avoid if from getting fragmented.

I expect an in depth answer at the OSI layers when a frame arrives at the LAN interface and how does adjust-mss command work on that frame and how does ip mtu command work on that frame.

Also i know the difference that ip mtu works only egress and adjust-mss works both ingress and egress.

Many times I have come across, customer complains of application issues and it gets resolved by using the command ip tcp adjust-mss on the incoming interface of PE that connects to the CE or on the incoming LAN interface of CE or on the egress WAN interface of CE that connects to the PE.

Also i need to know what is the best recommended value to be set for ip tcp adjust-mss and where it should be applied as said above.




ip tcp adjust-mss and ip mtu difference

Hi Vin,

i don't know what you mean with "an in-depth" answer because indeed there is not much to say about what these commnads are, maybe a little bit more about the mtu discovery mechanisms and mss settings. By the way MTU and MSS are pretty much the same thing wih a quite important difference:

MTU = Layer 2

MSS= Layer 4

ip tcp mss-adjust is a brilliant command because in the moment you coordinate the values of layer two frames  and layer four segments you greatly reduce fragmentation that can be a quite big issue considering the environment you are talking about (ISP-MPLS VPN and CE-CE || CE-PE routing).

Hope this helps


Super Bronze

Re: ip tcp adjust-mss and ip mtu difference


The  Author of this posting offers the information contained within this  posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that  there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose.  Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not  be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this  posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.

Liability Disclaimer

In  no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including,  without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out  of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author  has been advised of the possibility of such damage.


The purpose of tcp mss-adjust is to avoid any packet fragmentation from the initial TCP handshake.  If PMTUD is active and working correctly, fragmentation will be detected, but you still take a slight performance hit as packets are rejected then retransmitted; then repeat.  (NB: also the older version of PMTUD doesn't inform the sender of the actual MTU and slows the process even more doing trial and error.)

Normally you set the tcp mss-adjust to reduce the normal MSS by whatever your MTU reduction is.  So, for example if sending "normal" size Ethernet across a typical GRE tunnel, MTU is 1500 and MSS is 1460, so you subtract 24 (GRE overhead) from MSS and use a setting of 1436.  Even smaller might be set to allow for expected, or unexpected, header options.

As to where to set it, best is anywhere along the path where only the necessary traffic will be modified.  If you have a router with only such traffic passing through it, you could set on the LAN side or WAN side.  However, if the router has multiple interfaces, and might be routing LAN to LAN traffic, then you, ideally, only want to apply command on the necessary WAN interface.

The command only affects TCP traffic, and only TCP during it's initial handshake.  If traffic has different paths, with different MTUs, especially if the path selection can vary dynamically, it's possible either traffic won't be adjusted that should be or conversely traffic is adjusted that shouldn't be.

PMTUD should still be used in conjunction with tcp mss-adjust.

Community Member

ip tcp adjust-mss and ip mtu difference

Great post Joseph and I like the detail

Community Member

Re: ip tcp adjust-mss and ip mtu difference

"So, for example if sending "normal" size Ethernet across a typical GRE tunnel, MTU is 1500 and MSS is 1460"


If mtu is 1500 then why is mss 1460?

Super Bronze

Re: ip tcp adjust-mss and ip mtu difference

Standard L2 and L3 headers are 20 bytes each. So 1500 - 20 - 20 = 1460 (for MSS).

A "gocha", is the standard L2 and L3 headers are 20 bytes each, which means one or both, due to additional L2 or L3 option fields, might be bigger. The sending source will "know" this, but a transit tcp adjust-mss doesn't. This means it's possible TCP packets might be too large when tcp adjust-mss is only configured to MTU less 40.
CreatePlease to create content