Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements
Webcast-Catalyst9k
New Member

Keepalive

Trying to come up with a "best practices" for the keepalive command on an HDLC encapsulated serial interface. I have multiple Satellite connections to support, and all but one have the keepalive command enabled. Why would the keepalive command be disabled on a serial interface connected to a point-to-point satellite connection? What are the advantages and drawbacks?

1 REPLY
Hall of Fame Super Gold

Re: Keepalive

Tim

I am not sure why keepalives would be off on a single interface other than the possibility that some one at some time turned it off.

In general I believe that best practice is to have keepalive enabled on HDLC interfaces.

I believe that the primary advantage is that the router proactively determines whether the interface/link is working and therefore whether it is safe to send data over the link. The way that HDLC keepalives work is that each end of the link sends keepalive packets to the other end. Included in the keepalive packet are counters generated on the local device and counters reported from the remote device. So long as a device sees the correct values of its counters being reported by the remote device the router knows that the link is working. This effectively tests two way or round trip connectivity. If three consecutive keepalives are missed, or if the counter being reported does not increment properly then the router marks the interface as protocol down and will not transmit data over the link. I think that is a pretty major advantage.

The primary disadvantage is that the keepalive uses part of the link bandwidth (a very small part). If you were in a situation where you pay a per packet charge for traffic transmitted you might think twice about keepalives.

HTH

Rick

104
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies
CreatePlease to create content