LAN bandwidth utilization is skewed, my manager won't accept my reason.
I have my Core Switch in the B.A.6.250 segment and, prefix /22. The .4.x and .5.x and .7.x in my LAN have underutilized bandwidth. Graphs from the ISP showed that .6.x segment hosts are 10times of the rest segments in my LAN range. Users also complained that access to the Internet is slow. When I gave static address in the .6.x segment and users reported improvements. On the CS, I have Default Static, Static & RIP
routing enabled. Though, their next hop interface is points to 2 different ISP with my firewall inbetween.
Though, my distribution & Access Layer DCEs are all in .6.x segment. have U any reason why B.A.4.x & B.A.5.x & B.A.7.x are slow.
I have my reasons but, my manager knows alot too. He didn't believe and, he seeks further reasons.
Hi everyone, I would like to thank you in advance for any help you can provide a newcomer like myself!
Im studying the 100-105 book by Odom and am currently on the topic of Port security. I purchased a used 2960 and I'm trying to follow a...
While deploying a number of 18xx/2802/3802 model access points (APs), which run AP-COS as their operating platform. It can be observed on some occasions that while many of their access points were able to join the fabric WLC withou...
I am going to design and build an LAN network under a tunnel underground with long distance between the switches.
I will have 2 Catalyst switches and 8 Industrial IE3000, and they will be connected with fiber.
For now I am planning on use Layer-2 s...