12-27-2011 03:19 AM - edited 03-04-2019 02:45 PM
Hi,
we are discussing about the behaviour of the built-in policer of LLQ.
If we configure following service-policy on a WAN-interface in the case there is no other traffic, is traffic which matches the criteria of class QOS-Class-Realtime allowed to exceed the 20% of the total available bandwidth, or is exceeding traffic always dropped independent if the line is congested or not.
policy-map QOS-Policy-WAN
class QOS-Class-Network-Control
class QOS-Class-Realtime
priority percent 20
class QOS-Class-Platinum
bandwidth remaining percent 45
class QOS-Class-Gold
bandwidth remaining percent 10
class QOS-Class-Silver
bandwidth remaining percent 25
class QOS-Class-Bronze
bandwidth remaining percent 10
class QOS-Class-Best-Effort
Thx
Hubert
12-27-2011 03:29 AM
Hi hubert
The LLQ builtin policed will not take effect until the interface get congested
In other words If the interface is NOT congested the Traffic of the LLQ class cam exceed the LLQ allocated bandwidth
Hope this help
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App
12-27-2011 03:33 AM
Thx that what I assumed. If I remember correctly there they noticed in some QOS-guide that you should not configure more than 30% of available BW for the LLQ , I cant find this statement, do you know what could be the reason for this ?
12-27-2011 03:34 AM
Thx that what I assumed. If I remember correctly there they noticed in some QOS-guide that you should not configure more than 30% of available BW for the LLQ , I cant find this statement, do you know what could be the reason for this ?
12-27-2011 03:44 AM
Not sure if there is such limitation for that but MQC will only allow 75% of the interface bandwidth to be allocated by default and to remove this restriction command -Max-reserved-bandwidth 100 should be used under interface.
Thanks
Ajay
12-27-2011 03:48 AM
This restriction does not longer exist with 15.0 based images
12-27-2011 05:21 AM
Because the llq will always serviced first in the case of interface congestion it's best practice to allocate around 30 or 33% for VoIP if enough to avoid having the llq class take over other types of traffic
However it is not must if it dosent meet your needs
Hope this help
If helpful rate
12-27-2011 09:18 AM
Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
NB: That's correct in that Cisco documents this as the reason for their recommendation. However, keeping your LLQ to under about 1/3 of link capacity also tends to insure adequate bandwidth to avoid queuing delays against itself.
12-27-2011 08:07 AM
Hubert, checking your config:
policy-map QOS-Policy-WAN
class QOS-Class-Network-Control
class QOS-Class-Realtime
priority percent 20
class QOS-Class-Platinum
bandwidth remaining percent 45
class QOS-Class-Gold
bandwidth remaining percent 10
class QOS-Class-Silver
bandwidth remaining percent 25
class QOS-Class-Bronze
bandwidth remaining percent 10
class QOS-Class-Best-Effort
and... not having a restriction (75% of int bandw) your class REALTIME can use as much bandwidth it needs, IF there's no other classes competing for the bandwidth and we have no congestion.
In case of congestion, LLQ classes will have a MAX while the others will have a MIN bandwidth guaranteed.
LLQ have strict priority, which means that packets will be fwd as soon as it hits the router. In case the queue is FULL (congestion) the router will try to transmit, BUT it wont have strict priority
I always configure a policing policy map under the real time classes, to make sure when it exceeds the MAX packet will be dropped.
I hope this helps..
Please, rate useful posts.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide