I have a customer whom has 2 connections at the edge, ISP 1 at Edge A and ISP 2 at Edge B. Each edge is a 2611 router which hands off to a PIX 515 E.
I have an allotment of public addresses from each of the two providers.
I want to place a Mail Server Front End in my DMZ. The DMZ is comprised of the Inside interfaces of the two PIX's just mentioned as well as a 3rd PIX which effectively guards the Inside Perimeter.
My question is this: Can I set up NAT translations on each of the Edges (obviously I can; I want to know if this will work!) for the Mail Server in the DMZ.
The reason that I ask this is that if in fact one of the ISP connections were to fail I would like to have a redundant configuration that would dynamically enable our Customer's Corporate Email to continue functioning.
In this configuration I would make the 2 telecom companies works for you. We have redundant 2811s facing the Internet. Both peer using BGP to our providers... and we take on full routing tables (this is the norm at most places). We simply requested to advertise our primary subnet out both providers. This took filling out forms but was completed relatively quickly (we use Time Warner & PaeTec). In the event of a link failure, our Internet address range is already being advertised out the other provider. No changes to a NAT or firewall required for the failover. This bypasses any NAT and the configuration is minimal to use this technique. I could turn off one of the 2811s right now and there would be no hiccup in our operations. I'd prefer this solution over a dual-NAT (once on the firewall, then on the router?). I know it's a pain to deal with the providers but it really is an easy request and they're paid to work for you. Hope this helps and if you have any questions let me know.
Mike's solution is the way most compainies do this.
The issue you have with tring to implement mikes method as well as your nat solution is that you state you have "pools of public addresses you got from your isps"
You must have your own regitered IP's to use a bgp based solution. You will also need a AS number but getting a block of ip's will be the challenge.
To your NAT solution. This works well for outgoing sessions but gets complex for incoming ones. The main issue is how the person on the outside knows which of your NAT'ed address to use. You must use the pool of addresses owned by each provider on their connection, you cannot cross them. This is primarialy a DNS problem and you will have to work with your upstream DNS providers. In your case you are somewhat lucky you are talking mail and not something like a web server. Smtp mail software understands multiple paths and will try them all eventually to deliver mail. Its been a very long time since I defined MX records in a DNS so there may be something I am forgetting but I am sure you can still do this.
Thanks so much for your accurate response to my issue.
Ironically enough, I do have to put a Web Server in my DMZ.
Either he won't be redundant out both links, or I will have to pursue what Mike had recommended (which I actually like, I just cant stand dealing with the folks at Sprint!). I probably will bite the bullet on this one and call.
Thanks for your detailed and thorough explanation.
I have to evaluate the potential hassle based upon legacy dealings with the providers (Sprint is our issue). Obviously if I can get them to allow configuration you have recommended it would be the best option for the customer.
Hi everyone, I would like to thank you in advance for any help you can provide a newcomer like myself!
Im studying the 100-105 book by Odom and am currently on the topic of Port security. I purchased a used 2960 and I'm trying to follow a...
While deploying a number of 18xx/2802/3802 model access points (APs), which run AP-COS as their operating platform. It can be observed on some occasions that while many of their access points were able to join the fabric WLC withou...
I am going to design and build an LAN network under a tunnel underground with long distance between the switches.
I will have 2 Catalyst switches and 8 Industrial IE3000, and they will be connected with fiber.
For now I am planning on use Layer-2 s...