I have come to a dead end and I would really appreciate your insight.Our network is running OSPF and we want to achieve symmetric routing with our branches (anything that comes through routerA should exit from routerA) as can be seen in the attached file. I know that the solution would be to run eBGP with the provider and with BGP attributes (AS prepend, local preference) manipulate the traffic, but my company wants to create an OSPF neighborship with the PEs. The incoming traffic will be routed by the providers MPLS, so no worries there. The only solution I can think of to route the outgoing traffic to either routerA or routerB is to use static routes. My company is yet again not fond of static routes, but everything I have read about OSPF being a link-state protocol has driven me to a dead end. Is there a way to influence the metric of the specific routes?
Any suggestions or reading material would be highly appreciated.
PS. The attached file does not show the topology behind the 2 CPEs. Each is connected to a 6509 and the 6509 have a connection between them. So it looks like a square with one side missing.
It really helps to know that assymetric routing won't be such a worry.
My question regarding your answer is that if I change the cost on the interfaces towards PE and 65xx then one link will always be preferred. Correct?
The good thing is that my company is beginning to understand the benefits of BGP, so I hope that we will implement my original suggestion. Furthermore it turns out that our provider is pretty unwilling to form OSPF neighborship with us!!!
I have been dying to implement BGP, so here is my chance
As Guiseppe told that you won't face any issue ultill an unless you have firewall in current senario.
And in existing senario you have two options:
1] To keep Router A as a primary & Router B as a secondary.
2] Or keep as same your current network.
So for 1st option you can play with OSPF cost to set as router A as a primary & Router B as a secondary.
And if you want to distribute traffic with both router A & router B then you need to configure PBR in your Core switch saying that few network next hop is router A & other remaning network use router B that use default becasue of OSPF cost , so only few netork need to divert to other router . so in this way you can distribute traffic from HO to location & From Locaiton to HO you can tell ISP to use same PBR list to set next hop as a router A or B ( in this senario you need to configure first as option 1 mention above so only one will be active & second will be backup ,So using PBR on both i.e. Core & PE you can divert traffic to other path that is unused)
But i dont know if your company don't have any firewall in current senario or any issue then why need a change or this is what above solution i don't prefer to do becasue to achive what you want you have special dedicated protocol i.e. BGP.
but still we are engineers we need to follow the orders given by company.
Hi everyone, I would like to thank you in advance for any help you can provide a newcomer like myself!
Im studying the 100-105 book by Odom and am currently on the topic of Port security. I purchased a used 2960 and I'm trying to follow a...
While deploying a number of 18xx/2802/3802 model access points (APs), which run AP-COS as their operating platform. It can be observed on some occasions that while many of their access points were able to join the fabric WLC withou...