Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

ME 3600X Inter-VLAN/Bridge-Domain Routing

Hello All,

We've run across a rather odd issue with inter-vlan/bridge-domain routing on a ME-3600X-24FS switch.

When routing to a directly connected subnet from single tagged EVC's we don't see any issues.  However, when routing from a double tagged EVC to a single tagged EVC, in different bridge-domain's, same VRF, routing dies.  We can successfully PING from a host on the double tagged EVC to an IP on the opposite bridge-domain/vlan configured locally on the 3600X, just not a host connected to the single tagged EVC.  We can also successfully PING from a host on the double tagged EVC to a host on the same bridge-domain on a single tagged EVC.  So the issue here seems to be from a double tagged EVC to a single tagged EVC, located in a different bridge-domain, same VRF.

From all of our testing this is starting to look like a possible IOS bug.  However, we wanted to run this past the community first in case anyone has run into a similar issue or had any suggestions.

Sample config:

Double tagged EVC on G0/1:

service instance 1 ethernet

  description (removed)

  encapsulation dot1q 1101 second-dot1q 1104

  rewrite ingress tag pop 2 symmetric

  bridge-domain 99

!

Single tagged EVC on G0/2:

service instance 3 ethernet

  description (removed)

  encapsulation dot1q 98

  rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric

  bridge-domain 98

!

VLAN interface config:

interface Vlan98

description (removed)

ip vrf forwarding MGMT

ip address 10.64.0.129 255.255.255.240

!

interface Vlan99

description (removed)

ip vrf forwarding MGMT

ip address 10.64.2.1 255.255.254.0

!

Everyone's tags (4)
1 REPLY
New Member

ME 3600X Inter-VLAN/Bridge-Domain Routing

We have recently upgraded to 15.3.3S and found that this issue is resolved.

430
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies
CreatePlease login to create content