I've got a situation that requires me to translate a port only and not the actual address. I've tested this in gns and it works well, as long as the address that I'm translating isn't directly connected to the router; otherwise I get an address conflict. My saving grace is that in my real world scenario, I don't have the subnet directly attached to the router for the address that I'm translating, but instead I have a static route that points to a next hop and I readvertise that static route into bgp.
What I'm wondering is if: a) there's a better way to do this, or if not b) could there potentially be any issues with doing this that I'm just not seeing in a lab environment?
I've got a web server running on 52001 that has to run on 80. The hosting company can't seem to get it changed, so I figured I could nat the port. I configured it like:
ip nat source static tcp 192.168.1.50 52001 192.168.1.50 80
ip nat enable
ip nat enable
Like I said, it works fine, but is there a better way to do this without nat (I'm not aware of any other way) and could there be any potential issues with this?
This is actually a pretty cool feature, i didn't even know it existed until I was looking for a solution to advertise a subnet (prefix in BGP talk), only if a certain condition existed. This is exactly what conditional advertisements does
j ai une question j ai achete un routeur cisco 887VA-k9 , je le configuré avec la configuration ci- dessous
si je le lier avec mon pc portable sur l un de ses ports directement ça marche toute est bien ( la connexion internet + m...
Attached policy provides CLI access to the Cisco 4G router over text messaging. Two files are in the attached .tar file:
2. PDF with instructions on how to load and use the .tcl file.