My network is a hub and spoke network(monstly). My remote sites have 5-10 users.
Meantime i have a lot of 3550 switches layer 3.
The last 3 months i am trying to migrate from RIPv2 to EIGRP.
At every remote site i have a router 1700 series,and in some cases C800 series . Also i have a switch L2 cisco.
At every remote router i run EIGRP stub network . The question is this.
What is better to do?
Leave the Router running EIGRP stub network with a L2 switch or L3 switch(working as a L2 switch), or install a L3 switch at remote site which will run EIGRP stub network(and configure the router to run a full EIGRP). Which design will increase my network performance.
Mohammed is dead-on with his suggestion. I only recommend L3 switch at a remote site if you have multiple Vlans. Inter-Vlan routing at the L3 switch is much faster (locally) than using the router.
Have you migrated to EIGRP or planning to ? It wasn't clear from the post. What kind of WAN connection do you have ? Frame-Relay or Point-to-Point ? If Frame-Relay, did you create subinterfaces at the hub ?
This is actually a pretty cool feature, i didn't even know it existed until I was looking for a solution to advertise a subnet (prefix in BGP talk), only if a certain condition existed. This is exactly what conditional advertisements does
j ai une question j ai achete un routeur cisco 887VA-k9 , je le configuré avec la configuration ci- dessous
si je le lier avec mon pc portable sur l un de ses ports directement ça marche toute est bien ( la connexion internet + m...
Attached policy provides CLI access to the Cisco 4G router over text messaging. Two files are in the attached .tar file:
2. PDF with instructions on how to load and use the .tcl file.