Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

Nexus 5548 - keepalive recommendation

Hi all,

I know for N5K is best practice to use the mgmt0 interface for keepalive.

In our case it isn't possible to use this copper port.

Is it a good practice to use a routed port-channel as a point to point link between the two devices and put them into a separat vrf ?

int eth1/7 - 8

no sw

channel-group X mode active

int po X

ip add x.x.x.x/30

vpc domain 10

peer-keepalive destination x.x.x.2 source x.x.x.1 vrf vpc-keepalive

The N5K has a Layer 3 modul and licence

Thanks

Udo

2 REPLIES

Nexus 5548 - keepalive recommendation

That is a valid configuration but you don't really need a port channel. 1Gbps will be sufficient.

If this ink fails it has no impact on the vPC domain or data forwarding:

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/datacenter/nexus5000/sw/operations/n5k_vpc_ops.html#wp425287

See below for keep alive link recommendations:

https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-21147

Don't forget to rate all helpful posts.

New Member

Re: Nexus 5548 - keepalive recommendation

Thanks sean...

In most technical docs I don't see the difference between a N5K with or w/o Layer 3 module. But this this is important regarding the creating of a separat vrf and a dedicated L3 Link.

Without this it isn't possible to create a L3 Link nor a L3 Portchannel.

Udo

267
Views
4
Helpful
2
Replies
CreatePlease login to create content