Were we sold the wrong product? We installed 2 NM-1A-T3/E3 cards in our 3845, upgraded to c3845-entservicesk9-mz.124-24.T3.bin, but the interfaces show up as ATMX/0 instead of serialX/0.
We need to set up frame relay encapsulation. I can't find ay examples that show how to set this up on a ATM interface (actually it's not possible) and I don't see any current production T3 cards available for the 3845 other than the "non-A" NM-1-T3/E3 (unless the old 7000-series T3 WICs are recommended for this configuration.) Or were we sold a NM-1A-T3/E3 instead of a NM-1-T3/E3, which I was given to understand has been superceded by the NM-1A-T3/E3?
Did we buy the wrong hardware? Is it even possible to set up a T3 with frame relay encapsulation on a 3845?
Thanks, I suspected this after doing some searching around. We were given the impression that the "NM-1A-T3/E3" simply superceded the "NM-1-T3/E3", which does not seem to be available anymore. What happens when you let big computer vendors sell Cisco equipment with untrained sales people ...
Not sure if the SP can provide FRF.8 for us within the tariffs they are forced to obey. Even though the SONET network they are splitting our T3's off of is only three feet away from our router. The could just as easily give us an ATM PVC or Ethernet MAN, but can't (for a reasonable price. We were quoted $16K/mo for 100mbit MAN, for example.)
This is actually a pretty cool feature, i didn't even know it existed until I was looking for a solution to advertise a subnet (prefix in BGP talk), only if a certain condition existed. This is exactly what conditional advertisements does
j ai une question j ai achete un routeur cisco 887VA-k9 , je le configuré avec la configuration ci- dessous
si je le lier avec mon pc portable sur l un de ses ports directement ça marche toute est bien ( la connexion internet + m...
Attached policy provides CLI access to the Cisco 4G router over text messaging. Two files are in the attached .tar file:
2. PDF with instructions on how to load and use the .tcl file.