cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
288
Views
0
Helpful
2
Replies

no OSPF route record in the routing table

att-sgcops
Level 1
Level 1

topology:

R4----R1----R2----R3

R4 and R1 under OSPF area 4, R1 and R2 are running area 0, and R3 and R2 in OSPF area 3.

From R1, I can see:

R1#sh ip ospf data

OSPF Router with ID (40.40.40.1) (Process ID 1)

Router Link States (Area 0)

Link ID ADV Router Age Seq# Checksum Link count

40.40.40.1 40.40.40.1 1499 0x8000000A 0xAFBA 2

172.168.32.1 172.168.32.1 1296 0x80000008 0x74F4 2

Net Link States (Area 0)

Link ID ADV Router Age Seq# Checksum

20.20.20.2 172.168.32.1 1500 0x80000007 0x3959

Summary Net Link States (Area 0)

Link ID ADV Router Age Seq# Checksum

3.3.3.3 172.168.32.1 1255 0x80000001 0x2F80

30.30.30.0 172.168.32.1 458 0x80000004 0x6DF1

40.40.40.0 40.40.40.1 1494 0x80000001 0x2BB7

Router Link States (Area 4)

Link ID ADV Router Age Seq# Checksum Link count

40.40.40.1 40.40.40.1 1498 0x80000002 0x5898 2

40.40.40.4 40.40.40.4 1501 0x80000002 0xACAF 2

Summary Net Link States (Area 4)

Link ID ADV Router Age Seq# Checksum

20.20.20.0 40.40.40.1 1505 0x80000001 0xEB36

but there is not any OSPF route in the routing table:

R1# sh ip ro

Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP

D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area

N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2

E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP

i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, ia - IS-IS inter area

* - candidate default, U - per-user static route, o - ODR

P - periodic downloaded static route

Gateway of last resort is not set

20.0.0.0/30 is subnetted, 1 subnets

C 20.20.20.0 is directly connected, Serial2

40.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets

C 40.40.40.0 is directly connected, Serial4

R1#

Any reason?

many thanks

2 Replies 2

Richard Burts
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

It would help us be able to give you a better answer if you would post the relevant parts of the config at least of R1 (interface configs and any routing config).

HTH

Rick

HTH

Rick

Hello,

also the output of "show ip protocol" on R1 would help to see what is going on.

By any chance:

a) did you modify the administrative distance to 255?

b) Do you have OSPF VRF config in place, because then the down-bit could cause the observed behaviour.

Hope this helps!

Regards, Martin

Review Cisco Networking products for a $25 gift card