Hi all, this is not a typical cisco issue but due to positive feedbacks i am asking it here
We have published our website through a webhosting company, we have 2 links to 2 different ISPs, ISP1 and ISP2. when a user opens this site https://ebanking.xxxx.com the nsrecord returns the DNS ip of ISP1. since we know that NS record can contain only 1 A record ( as told by the webhosting company ), we have used the DNS IP of ISP1. now the problem is that when ISP1 goes down users cannot open ebanking.xxx.com, coz there is only 1 A record there, so we want it to shift automatically to DNS server of ISP2, is it possible ??
sorry but i didnt get it, the ip that our webhosting company returns is the public ip of ISP1 which we have purchased, now they have denied that they cant enter another A record for the same domain ( they said its not possible ) so what is the solution to this problem ?? is there a workaround ?
For DNS, there is only one Master or SOA (Start of Authority) where you can manage records. But you can have multiple Slaves.
As best practice, ISP should have more than one Slave and each DNS (Master or Slaves) is in different network (/24). Master and Slave/s are hosted in different location geographically though it belongs to the same ISP. This means, they have the following redundancy; location, power, internet link, etc..
If your ISP is not using best practice above, you can ask a second ISP to host a Slave DNS for you. i.e.
Master/SOA > ISP1
Slave 1 > ISP1
Slave 2 > ISP2
This way, if ISP1 is down, and the TTL expires on non-authoritative DNS. They can still contact Slave 2 (through ISP 2) for records.
hi dandy, but you see that we are not talking about ISP, we have given webhosting company a public ip taken from ISP1, and asked webhosting company to forward traffic coming to ebanking.xxx.com to that ip, now i think ISP1 doesnt have to do anything on its side, what shall we ask webhosting company to do as to when ISP1 goes down it should replace ISP1 ip with ISP2 ip, does webhosting company need its own ISP's help in this ??
I am sorry for the confusion since i am new to this type of scenarios, actually webhosting company is HOSTING or website www.xxx.com, it is NOT hosting ebanking.xxx.com but they have there Name Server published to internet, we asked them to add entry to their record which contains this
ebanking.xxx.com ---> IP of ISP1,
And ebanking server is present in our HO which is connected to ISP1 and ISP2,
is there any other confustion so kindly let me know,
We are pleased to announce availability of Beta software for 16.6.3.
16.6.3 will be the second rebuild on the 16.6 release train targeted
towards Catalyst 9500/9400/9300/3850/3650 switching platforms. We are
looking for early feedback from customers befor...
Introduction Featured Speakers Luis Espejel is the Telecommunications
Manager of IENova, an Oil & Gas company. Currently he works with Cisco
IOS® and Cisco IOS XE platforms, and NX to some extent. He has also
worked as a Senior Engineer with the Routing P...
In this session you can learn more about Layer 3 multicast and the best
practices to identify possible threats and take security measures. It
provides an overview of basic multicast, the best security practices for
use of this technology, and recommendati...