I found this issue when configuring NSSA. In my scenario there are 2 NSSA ABR's and 1 ASBR redistributing RIP V2 routes 18.104.22.168/16 in the NSSA Area 1 with metric 10 and metric-type 1 ,subnets.
Configuring area 1 as NSSA in R1 , R2 and R3 I found that R1 route table shows that 22.214.171.124/16 as E1 but R2 shows 126.96.36.199/16 as N1 routes.I changed the router-id of R1 to 172.16.0.10 and cleared the ip ospf proc.Post adj build up I found that ip route table of R2 showed 188.8.131.52/16 routes as E1 and
R1 showed N1 and R1 was type 7 to type 5 translating.
In fact I had reffered to the same link while troubleshooting . I got confused when I reffered in the Cisco Press book Troubleshooting IP routing Protocols the reverse is written the " The Lowest RID in Multi NSSA ASBR/ABR scenario does the translation"
Anyways thanks a lot.I was preparing for the CCIE R&S hope you you can give me some guidelines for preparation.
We are pleased to announce availability of Beta software for 16.6.3.
16.6.3 will be the second rebuild on the 16.6 release train targeted
towards Catalyst 9500/9400/9300/3850/3650 switching platforms. We are
looking for early feedback from customers befor...
Introduction Featured Speakers Luis Espejel is the Telecommunications
Manager of IENova, an Oil & Gas company. Currently he works with Cisco
IOS® and Cisco IOS XE platforms, and NX to some extent. He has also
worked as a Senior Engineer with the Routing P...
In this session you can learn more about Layer 3 multicast and the best
practices to identify possible threats and take security measures. It
provides an overview of basic multicast, the best security practices for
use of this technology, and recommendati...