My network currently exists as a single OSPF area, spread between 3 datacenters across the country. This has worked well for us because we don't have very complex routing issues and we've had the same three sites for years. We are now in a position though, where we are thinking about opening datacenters in other locations, including foreign datacenters.
My question is about single area vs. multi-area OSPF design. I don't have a lot of routers... and will probably never have any huge number. The links between the sites are all DS3's or higher, and in some cases redundant links are installed.
Would it make sense to move to a multi area OSPF design, with each site being it's own area, or would that be overkill? I've attached two diagrams indicating what I have setup now, versus what I imagine the multi-area design to be.
I see the following as potential benefits to a multi-area setup:
-route summarization between areas simplifies routing tables
-Less routes means less LSA's between geographically seperated sites
-Loss of Area 0 WAN link doesn't cause routing reconvergence problems at each site.
provide a double link of each site area to area 0.
You can have less SPF calculations because they are bonded to each area and this is another benefit.
The question is have you got internal routers on each site that can benefit from the multiple area approach ?
If you have only the front end routers at each site migration is very simple just modify the network commands so that IP subnets internal to the site can be associated to non-backbone site-specific area.
Otherwise you need to use double links on every internal router and migrate one by one to avoid to lost control of internal routers
when changing the area number ospf adj must be rebuilt.
area number and type must match to build the ospf adj
I would do it because it will provide more scalability even if there aren't internal routers in site at the moment.
It makes more sense to create multiple areas. This will allow you to summaries network segements on the ABRs => Less routing reconvergence in case some routes disappear from the edge routes/MLS Switches.
In order to achieve this, you need to terminate the WAN side of the routers to area 0 ,which will be the ABR, and the other side of the router with the MLS switch to area 1 for example. Then you can do route summarizations and LSA filtering between areas on the ABRs.
Hi everyone, I would like to thank you in advance for any help you can provide a newcomer like myself!
Im studying the 100-105 book by Odom and am currently on the topic of Port security. I purchased a used 2960 and I'm trying to follow a...
While deploying a number of 18xx/2802/3802 model access points (APs), which run AP-COS as their operating platform. It can be observed on some occasions that while many of their access points were able to join the fabric WLC withou...
I am going to design and build an LAN network under a tunnel underground with long distance between the switches.
I will have 2 Catalyst switches and 8 Industrial IE3000, and they will be connected with fiber.
For now I am planning on use Layer-2 s...