cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
5916
Views
6
Helpful
5
Replies

OSPF communication without area 0

Hi

 

I am having this setup

 

R1--R2--R3

 

R1-R2 are in Area 2 & R2-R3 are in Area3,   Can I communicate in between R1-R3 by any other possible way without adding Area-0

5 Replies 5

ghostinthenet
Level 7
Level 7

No. OSPF requires that there be an area 0 for routing between two different areas.

However, because you have a common router (R2) that holds both areas 1 and 3, you can enable inter-area routing easily by creating a loopback interface on R2 and adding it to area 0, meeting OSPF's requirements.

johnlloyd_13
Level 9
Level 9

Hi,

Yes, you could by using OSPF virtual link or setup GRE tunnels.

See helpful link:

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/open-shortest-path-first-ospf/47866-ospfdb7.html

 

Virtual links still require a path back to area 0, which is problematic if there is no area 0. A GRE tunnel will work well if the tunnel itself is in area 0 and there is no common router between the areas, but an area 0 loopback on the common router presents the simplest solution.

Joseph W. Doherty
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

Disclaimer

The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.

Liability Disclaimer

In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.

Posting

Yes, you can.

If, on R2, the two areas are in the same OSPF process, the answer is generally no.  (I write generally, because you could ping or telnet between R1 and R3 across a tunnel [or a new physical interconnection link] but they won't exchange routes.)

However, if you place the areas into different OSPF processes, you can redistribute routes between the OSPF processes on R2.  (Of course, I'm assuming normal OSPF areas.)

Definitely outside-of-the-box thinking. :)

Getting Started

Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community:

Review Cisco Networking products for a $25 gift card