Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

OSPF Confusion

Hi Guys,

What are the differences among the following statements:

1)

router ospf 1

summary-address 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 tag 11122

redistribute ospf 2 metric 5000 subnets route-map TAG-Question

route-map TAG-Question permit 10

match ip address TAG_ACL

2)

router ospf 1

summary-address 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0

redistribute ospf 2 metric 5000 subnets route-map TAG-Question

route-map TAG-Question permit 10

match ip address TAG_ACL

set tag 11122

3)

router ospf 1

summary-address 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 tag 11122

redistribute ospf 2 metric 5000 subnets route-map TAG-Question

route-map TAG-Question permit 10

match ip address TAG_ACL

set tag 11122

According to my understanding no 1 & 2 does the same thing,please correct me if I am wrong. However I am confused with the no.3.

Regards,

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
Hall of Fame Super Silver

Re: OSPF Confusion

Hello Iqbal,

here you have two statements in each OSPF routing process:

a redistribute OSPF 2 + options

a summary -address + options

the results can be different depending on what routes are present in OSPF 2 DB (and in the IP routing table otherwise they are not redistributed into OSPF1).

If all OSPF 2 subnets are within net 10/8 the first option will:

create and propagate a summary address 10/8 with route-tag 11122 in the route tag field of the LSA external type 5 with seed metric 5000. (subnets are suppressed by the summary-address command they are in the router DB but they are not sent out in OSPF1 domain)

if all OSPF 2 subnets are within net 10/8 second option will:

create and propagate a summary address 10/8 with route-tag 2 in the route tag field of the LSA external type 5 with seed metric 5000.

Can you see the difference ?

if OSPF 2 DB and routing table contains prefixes out of net 10/8 and permitted by the ACL:

all the subnets in 10/8 will be suppressed and the summary 10/8 is created as described above.

Prefixes out of net 10/8 will:

have a route-tag of 2 in case 1)

have a route-tag of 11122 in case 2)

in 3) being the route-tag value the same in both commands:

net 10/8 will have route-tag 11122

if other prefixes out of 10/8 are imported by ospf2 into ospf1 they also have route-tag 11122

Hope to help

Giuseppe

1 REPLY
Hall of Fame Super Silver

Re: OSPF Confusion

Hello Iqbal,

here you have two statements in each OSPF routing process:

a redistribute OSPF 2 + options

a summary -address + options

the results can be different depending on what routes are present in OSPF 2 DB (and in the IP routing table otherwise they are not redistributed into OSPF1).

If all OSPF 2 subnets are within net 10/8 the first option will:

create and propagate a summary address 10/8 with route-tag 11122 in the route tag field of the LSA external type 5 with seed metric 5000. (subnets are suppressed by the summary-address command they are in the router DB but they are not sent out in OSPF1 domain)

if all OSPF 2 subnets are within net 10/8 second option will:

create and propagate a summary address 10/8 with route-tag 2 in the route tag field of the LSA external type 5 with seed metric 5000.

Can you see the difference ?

if OSPF 2 DB and routing table contains prefixes out of net 10/8 and permitted by the ACL:

all the subnets in 10/8 will be suppressed and the summary 10/8 is created as described above.

Prefixes out of net 10/8 will:

have a route-tag of 2 in case 1)

have a route-tag of 11122 in case 2)

in 3) being the route-tag value the same in both commands:

net 10/8 will have route-tag 11122

if other prefixes out of 10/8 are imported by ospf2 into ospf1 they also have route-tag 11122

Hope to help

Giuseppe

199
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies
CreatePlease login to create content