We have the following MPLS setup with OPSF as the routing protocol:
Provider edge routers (PE) act as ABR?s between the remote customer owned and managed routers (CE) and the Area 0 backbone. So, the Ethernet interface and Serial interface of the CE are on the same Area as well as the Serial Interface of the PE. The PE?s, acting as ABR?s then in turn connect all the remotes to Area 0.
The main site is Area 0 and each remote site is in a different incrementing area. So each remote router has all interfaces in the same area. (site 1 = area 1, site 2 = area2 etc?).
This may have nothing to do with my question:
How does OSPF handle the neighbor relationship and how the routes are processed?
For example, if I am distributing static routes at the main site (area 0) and give it a metric of 1000, the remote site that is Area 1 (adjacent)shows the route as an External route with a metric of 1000.
But the rest of the sites (area 2, area 3 and so on) show the route as an external route with a metric of 66.
The exact metric number I am not concerned about, but why aren?t all sites showing the metric of 1000?
This is actually a pretty cool feature, i didn't even know it existed until I was looking for a solution to advertise a subnet (prefix in BGP talk), only if a certain condition existed. This is exactly what conditional advertisements does
j ai une question j ai achete un routeur cisco 887VA-k9 , je le configuré avec la configuration ci- dessous
si je le lier avec mon pc portable sur l un de ses ports directement ça marche toute est bien ( la connexion internet + m...
Attached policy provides CLI access to the Cisco 4G router over text messaging. Two files are in the attached .tar file:
2. PDF with instructions on how to load and use the .tcl file.