I know that with OSPF we only advertise locally attached networks on the network statement of the OSPF process. Is that right ? I have a situation recently where we made some changes by disabling one interface and move that network now to be behind a firewall. I use to have 3 network statements on my router as follows:
network 192.168.1.2 0.0.0.0 area 1 network 192.168.1.52 0.0.0.0 area 1 network 192.168.9.1 0.0.0.0 area 1
Now since I move 192.168.9.0/24 behind a firewall via 192.168.1.52 interface I have to implement static routes. Check out my drawing with the red dotted lines the interface that was disabled.
Is there a way we can still tell my cisco router to advertise 192.168.9.0/24 coming off 192.168.1.52 ?
Sorry, I meant "however I don't see the route on the route on the OSPF routing table on my HQ router". Forgot to mention that my static routes is already in and currently working from the HQ router and also at the remote site (cisco 1841)
Hi everyone, I would like to thank you in advance for any help you can provide a newcomer like myself!
Im studying the 100-105 book by Odom and am currently on the topic of Port security. I purchased a used 2960 and I'm trying to follow a...
While deploying a number of 18xx/2802/3802 model access points (APs), which run AP-COS as their operating platform. It can be observed on some occasions that while many of their access points were able to join the fabric WLC withou...
I am going to design and build an LAN network under a tunnel underground with long distance between the switches.
I will have 2 Catalyst switches and 8 Industrial IE3000, and they will be connected with fiber.
For now I am planning on use Layer-2 s...