03-31-2007 07:27 AM - edited 03-03-2019 04:22 PM
Pls find attachment for Virtual link problem......
03-31-2007 08:36 AM
Hi,
We use virtual link where some areas have not a direct connection to the backbone area (Area 0). So here in what you sent, area 2 does not have a connection to Area 0, so virtual-link is necessary.
Router 3 has not a direct connection to Area 0 actually, but It thinks that it has a direct connection to Area 0 through Virtual links. All communication between Router 1 and Router is tunneled through virtual link thats why u see that is indicated "0" in the Router 3's routing table.
pls rate if it helps.
04-01-2007 03:45 AM
Hi,
Thanks ...let me know how r1 showing 12.0.0.0 as "OIA",this is also show as "O" as r3 is directly connected to R1 over virtual link...
O IA 12.0.0.0/8 [110/75] via 5.0.0.2, 00:38:02, Serial2/1/0
03-31-2007 11:29 AM
Hi,
OSPF requires that all areas be connected to area 0 and that area 0
must be contiguous. When this is not possible, you can use a virtual
link to bridge across an intermediate area.
Verify that the virtual link is up with the show ip ospf virtual-links
command. Additionally, virtual interfaces are treated as actual interfaces
by the OSPF process, and thus, their status can be verified with the
show ip ospf interface interface-id command.
hth
Raj
04-01-2007 05:29 AM
In your setup all 3 routers are ABRs;
R1 is part of area 1 & 0
R2 is part of area 1 & 0
R3 is part of area 1, 2 & 0
12.0.0.0/8 is part of area 2 and therefore it's an 'OIA' (inter-area) route as neither R1 or R2 are part of area 2.
HTH
Sundar
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide