Cisco Support Community
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
New Member

Problem increase bandwidth 64k to 256k

I put the next class map and traffic shapping.

At a time i have ping of 1200 ms and i can see in an application of monitoring the consumption of bandwidth does not come to 50k.

When applied the command "not class voice_256kb" in the interface Serial1/1.3, the ping low to 20 ms.

Do i have something wrong with the configuration?

policy-map 256K

class T

priority 100

compress header ip rtp

class S

bandwidth 32

class e

bandwidth 60

class class-default



map-class frame-relay voice_256kb

frame-relay cir 243200

frame-relay bc 2432

frame-relay be 0

frame-relay mincir 243200

service-policy output 256K

frame-relay fragment 320

interface Serial 1/1

bandwidth 2048

no ip address

no ip redirects

encapsulation frame-relay IETF

no ip mroute-cache

load-interval 30

serial restart-delay 0

no clns route-cache

frame-relay traffic-shaping

frame-relay lmi-type ansi

interface Serial1/1.3 point-to-point

bandwidth 256

ip address

ip summary-address eigrp 1 5

frame-relay interface-dlci 3

class voice_256kb

New Member

Re: Problem increase bandwidth 64k to 256k

I am thinking that provider don't change all configuration, and i have 64k yet

How do I know if the supplier change the speed of link to 256k?

New Member

Re: Problem increase bandwidth 64k to 256k

I try to explain mi problem better:

The link of frame relay was to 64k and was expanded to 256k, but i

think that the supplier has not done the enlargement.

At some times when i make a ping, it reaches 1200 ms, and when remove

the policy of the inerface Serial1/1.3, the ping reaches 25 ms.

If the link is even at 64, and increase the fragmentation to 320,

could this be causing the behavior that i have in the link?

Is there something wrong with the configuration that i am doing?

Or, Do the supplier has not done the increase of bandwidth?

CreatePlease to create content