Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

Problem with "pppoe enable group global"

Hello,

I configured a Cisco 1841 fpr PPPoE via Multilink PPP. I try to set the command

"pppoe enable group global"

for the FastEthernet0/0 and FastEthernet0/1 interfaces. But this command is not accepted, only "pppoe enable" is possible. Is there a big difference, could that cause a problem when I use "pppoe enable" instead of "pppoe enable group global"?

Here the example config for FastEthernet0/0:

interface FastEthernet0/0

description PPPOE WAN1

no ip address

no ip redirects

no ip unreachables

no ip proxy-arp

ip route-cache flow

duplex auto

speed auto

pppoe enable group global

pppoe-client dial-pool-number 1

no mop enabled

!

2 REPLIES

Re: Problem with "pppoe enable group global"

Hi,

If a PPPoE profile is not specified by using the group option, PPPoE sessions will be established using values from the global PPPoE profile.

PPPoE profiles must be configured using the bba-group pppoe command.

PPPoE on an Ethernet Interface Example

The following example enables PPPoE sessions on Ethernet interface 1/0. PPPoE sessions will be established using the PPPoE parameters in the global PPPoE profile.

interface ethernet1/0

pppoe enable

!

bba-group pppoe global

virtual-template 1

sessions max limit 8000

sessions per-vc limit 8

sessions per-mac limit 2

Hope this helps.

Regards,

Pravin

Hall of Fame Super Gold

Re: Problem with "pppoe enable group global"

Hi, despite what some older guide say, you don;t need any command beside pppoe-enable and pppoe-client for PPPoE under ethernet interface.

Note the ip commands under FA0/0 are unnecessary because the interface is not IP enabled, you should put them under dialer interface instead.

Hope thus helps, please rate post if it does!

3843
Views
0
Helpful
2
Replies