Problem with throughput between two routers on a split local loop
We have a scenario that has been tough to figure out. We are in the process of migrating our systems to another building, and in the interim our ISP has created a split local loop, so that we can use our public IP range at both buildings. This has been running OK for a month or so, but this week we started to have throughput issues. Traffic between the two sites becomes very slow after about 2 hours of working just fine, and when this occurs pings go from 20 msec to 500 msec when we ping from the 7206 at site 1 to the C3900e at site 2. However, both routers can ping their Internet gateway during this time and have normal response times. The interesting thing is that when we ping from the C3900e to the 7206, after a handful of pings the circuits speed back up, and traffic passes as normal. Unless we run a continuous ping from site 2 to site 1, we inevitably run into the throughput problem multiple times during the day.
We've disabled ip cef globally or ip route-cache cef on an interface, but this didn't help. We've also contacted the ISP providing the split local loop, but they are not seeing problems on their end. The processors on both routers are less than 5%, and there are no low memory issues on either router. The routers were rebooted 2 days ago, and neither router interface has thrown up a single error.
The 7206 is running 12.3(3)g, and the 3900e is running 15.2(4)M4.
Does anyone have an idea what we might check out? Thanks
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Can't say what your issue is, but I will say, if I only had a nickle for every time a service provider said their stuff is fine, I would be already retired.
We are pleased to announce availability of Beta software for 16.6.3.
16.6.3 will be the second rebuild on the 16.6 release train targeted
towards Catalyst 9500/9400/9300/3850/3650 switching platforms. We are
looking for early feedback from customers befor...
Introduction Featured Speakers Luis Espejel is the Telecommunications
Manager of IENova, an Oil & Gas company. Currently he works with Cisco
IOS® and Cisco IOS XE platforms, and NX to some extent. He has also
worked as a Senior Engineer with the Routing P...
In this session you can learn more about Layer 3 multicast and the best
practices to identify possible threats and take security measures. It
provides an overview of basic multicast, the best security practices for
use of this technology, and recommendati...