I have put together a QoS implementation between 3 6509 on each of our sites.
From what I have read the classification happens ingress on a port/vlan.
This is fine for all user and server vlans behind the switches, but what happens for traffic generated on the switch, i.e routing. I can't see how I can mark my EIGRP traffic before it traverses the WAN which is a bit like shutting the barn door after the horse has bolted.
I'm probably missing something obvious here but would appreciate anyone putting me straight.
Thanks for this. I was hoping that would be the case. I forgot to mention one other thing though... I noticed in the link you posted it says this is the case if running IOS on both the Sup Engine and the MSFC, two of my switches are hybrid so the msfc is IOS and the chassis is CATOS. Do you know if the same rule applies??
I'm thinking I should enable qos on the MSFC which should then mark the routing with IPPrec6. My guess is that the internal IP-Prec-COS mapping would allow the routing info to be placed in the priority queue at egress scheduling. I've defined the policies via CATOS as I read that if I configure my policies using the MSFC when using anything pre the Supervisor 720 and PFC3 (which I'm doing), then qos would only work in software.
This is actually a pretty cool feature, i didn't even know it existed until I was looking for a solution to advertise a subnet (prefix in BGP talk), only if a certain condition existed. This is exactly what conditional advertisements does
j ai une question j ai achete un routeur cisco 887VA-k9 , je le configuré avec la configuration ci- dessous
si je le lier avec mon pc portable sur l un de ses ports directement ça marche toute est bien ( la connexion internet + m...
Attached policy provides CLI access to the Cisco 4G router over text messaging. Two files are in the attached .tar file:
2. PDF with instructions on how to load and use the .tcl file.