Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. If you'd prefer to explore, try our test area to get started. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

[QoS] Does using set-dscp-transmit in a policer re-queue the packet?

Hi,

I'm using a policer within a class on an egress WAN interface of a remote site router.

The policer guarantees a minimum of 1Mbps of interesting traffic using bandwidth 1024.

The policer also remarks to default for any traffic exceeding this amount.

Does the traffic that exceeds 1Mbps get re-queued to account towards the class-default queue or does this packet still use up the interesting traffic queue?

policy-map QOS-CHILD
 class HTTPS
  bandwidth 1024
  police 1024000 192000 384000 conform-action set-dscp-transmit af31 exceed-action set-dscp-transmit default violate-action set-dscp-transmit 0
  queue-limit 256 packets
 class NETWORK-ROUTING
  bandwidth 100
 class NET-MGMT
  bandwidth 100
 class class-default
  fair-queue 256
  queue-limit 256 packets
policy-map WAN-SHAPER-PARENT
 class class-default
  shape average 8000000
  service-policy QOS-CHILD


policy-map LAN-QOS-IN
 class MARK-HTTPS
  set dscp af31
 class class-default
  set dscp default

Everyone's tags (1)
1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
Super Bronze

DisclaimerThe Author of this

Disclaimer

The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.

Liability Disclaimer

In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of   the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.

Posting

Believe they will stay in same queue.

3 REPLIES
Super Bronze

DisclaimerThe Author of this

Disclaimer

The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.

Liability Disclaimer

In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of   the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.

Posting

I believe, normally, a remarked packet, if remarked by an ingress policer, will treated as it if it had that marking upon egress.  I also believe, a remarked packet, if remarked by an egress policer, will continue to remain with other like egress traffic (i.e. the remarking doesn't change egress for that packet).

New Member

The remarking will occur on

The remarking will occur on egress however, what i mean is that will the remarked packet add to the queue-depth of the HTTPS queue or the class-default queue.

 

Super Bronze

DisclaimerThe Author of this

Disclaimer

The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.

Liability Disclaimer

In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of   the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.

Posting

Believe they will stay in same queue.

246
Views
0
Helpful
3
Replies