Class 1 EF 41% bw > LLC Queue (implemented with the priority command, not priority percent)
Class 2a AF31 30% bw > bandwidth percent 30
Class 2bAF41 20% bw > bandwidth percent 20
Class 3 best effort (remaining)
Link Capacity e.g 10G Ethernet
AF guarantees througput and low loss, EF low delay and jitter
My question is, do i need to police EF traffic or not? I beleive yes, because if EF allocates more bw than 41%, AF will probably tail droped. I dont want AF gets droped as long AF is below or equal the assigned bandwidth in my service policy
You may not need any additional policing. Priorit by deafault has policing integrated in to it, which comes in to play only when the link is congested. As long as link is free, priority ensures u get that min BW.
In any case, AF may not get taildropped due to EF.
We are pleased to announce availability of Beta software for 16.6.3.
16.6.3 will be the second rebuild on the 16.6 release train targeted
towards Catalyst 9500/9400/9300/3850/3650 switching platforms. We are
looking for early feedback from customers befor...
Introduction Featured Speakers Luis Espejel is the Telecommunications
Manager of IENova, an Oil & Gas company. Currently he works with Cisco
IOS® and Cisco IOS XE platforms, and NX to some extent. He has also
worked as a Senior Engineer with the Routing P...
In this session you can learn more about Layer 3 multicast and the best
practices to identify possible threats and take security measures. It
provides an overview of basic multicast, the best security practices for
use of this technology, and recommendati...