09-26-2005 01:25 PM - edited 03-03-2019 10:36 AM
Hi
I have a QoS nesting problem. Any help would be great.
I allocated certain 512kbps to one of a proxy servers 10.10.10.1 (Parent policy-map). Out of which I would like to give 128k to a website, 11.11.11.1 (Child policy-map).
CHILD POLICY-MAP
--------------------------
ip access-list extended child
permit tcp host 10.10.10.1 host 11.11.11.1 eq www
class-map match-all child
match access-group name child
policy-map child
class child
police cir 128000 bc 32000 be 32000
conform-action transmit
exceed-action drop
PARENT POLICY-MAP
--------------------------
ip access-list extended parent
permit tcp host 10.10.10.1 any eq www
class-map parent
match access-group name parent
policy-map parent
class parent
police cir 512000 bc 63000 be 32000
conform-action transmit
exceed-action drop
service-policy child
For some reason, it does not seems to work. There are hit counts on access-list parent but not on child. Any suggestions?
09-27-2005 04:24 AM
hi
do revert back any specific reason behind having the nesting policy kinda setup ?
are u applying this policy somewhere in your sub interface or something in that kind ?
if you have total 512K bandwidth and you want to have 128K to be alloted for some particular server i feel you have other workaround too to do that.
like configure LLQ for that 128K or else put it on simple CBWFQ itself and configure guarnteed b/w.
And configure another class with the remaining b/w available.
do revert more about the kinda setup you have deployed or running over there..
regds
09-27-2005 08:47 PM
Dont do nested groups for your child policy. Instead create 2 class maps apply the child class-map first in the policy and police it. It will work
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide