I am looking for some sort of validation or probably better recommendation for a traffic shaping design that we plan on implementing (service policy outbound) at the hub with dual Cisco7206 routers, each with 150M circuit facing to MPLS service provider. The servers are mostly located at the hub and the traffic pattern is basically hub and spoke that talk to around 200 remote sites with various circuit speed from T1 to 20M.
The objective is for the hub not to send traffic to a site at a higher bandwidth that the site can handle. I have defined that in the class-map and ACL for two sites but there will be more. My concern is for the remaining sites that are not explicitly defined.. they shouldn’t be shaped and should be able to use all available bandwidth of 150M. In the sample configuration below, I used shape peak percent 100 statement for all remaining site but need more validation.
We have 3 identical switches configured by someone else and would like to claim some of the Gigabit ports(G1/G2/G3/G4) for use on servers. When we try to change the wiring and configuration, we run in to connectivity issues. Attached is a des...
This is actually a pretty cool feature, i didn't even know it existed until I was looking for a solution to advertise a subnet (prefix in BGP talk), only if a certain condition existed. This is exactly what conditional advertisements does
j ai une question j ai achete un routeur cisco 887VA-k9 , je le configuré avec la configuration ci- dessous
si je le lier avec mon pc portable sur l un de ses ports directement ça marche toute est bien ( la connexion internet + m...