My problem is that although I am redistributing eigrp 50 into OSPF 100, only the routes native to eigrp 50 are getting redistributed into OSPF 100. I am redistributing eigrp 10 into eigrp 50 successfully as all of the routes from eigrp 10 show up in the eigrp 50 topology table but they are not redistributing on to ospf 100. Is there some sort of redistribution precedence thing happening since all of this is being done on the same router? Should I have to redistribute eigrp 10 into ospf 100 independently?
Hmm. This route map design is straight out of the eigrp design guide. That statement as I understand it, simply assigns the administrative tag of 50 to everything that did not match the prior deny clause. If it read "match tag 50", rather than "set tag 50", I would tend to agree with you.
What you are trying to do is called indirect redistribution i.e., redistribution of one protocol or process into another protocol or process and then subsequently redistributing the redistributed protocol into a third protocol on the same device. Indirect redistribution isn't supported on Cisco devices. Therefore, you would have to explicitly redistribute the EIGRP AS 10 into OSPF to get the desired results.
Hi everyone, I would like to thank you in advance for any help you can provide a newcomer like myself!
Im studying the 100-105 book by Odom and am currently on the topic of Port security. I purchased a used 2960 and I'm trying to follow a...
While deploying a number of 18xx/2802/3802 model access points (APs), which run AP-COS as their operating platform. It can be observed on some occasions that while many of their access points were able to join the fabric WLC withou...
I am going to design and build an LAN network under a tunnel underground with long distance between the switches.
I will have 2 Catalyst switches and 8 Industrial IE3000, and they will be connected with fiber.
For now I am planning on use Layer-2 s...