I got few questions regarding redistribution of static routes into EIGRP:
1 - Can I use sequenced access list with route-map to control which routes are being redistributed? For example, would following config stop any route towards 10.0.0.0/8 being redistributed:
ip access-list standard filter-static
10 deny static 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0
100 permit any
route-map STATIC permit 10
match ip address filter-static
router eigrp 100
redistribute static route-map STATIC
2- In config example 1 (if it works) if I update access list "filter-static" would I need to re-create route-map "STATIC" and/or to reapply it to eigrp process static redistribution or it will be updated dynamically?
However, my question was more specifically regarding sequenced access-list, while in your exaple you are using standard access-list. So far, on internet or in any of the books I have, I did not find a single example using sequenced access-list with route-map.
And, yes, you are right regarding the mask, I ment to inverse 255.0.0.0 and for some strange reason put totali wrong mask :( - I hope my brain will be switched on, when I do this on my production router.
We are pleased to announce availability of Beta software for 16.6.3. 16.6.3 will be the second rebuild on the 16.6 release train targeted towards Catalyst 9500/9400/9300/3850/3650 switching platforms. We are looking for early feedback from custome...